BCPals
Forums
BCPals Quiz
Photo Album
BCPals Chat
BCPals Links
Contacts
Medical Topics
Biopsies
Chemotherapy Depression Diagnosis
Herceptin
Hormone therapies
Imaging
Lymphoedema
PMPS
PN
Phyllodes
Ports
Radiotherapy
Reconstruction?
Reg. Recurrence
Scans Experience of
Scars
Surgery Diaries
Trials
Triple Negative
Special Topics
Benefits
Clothing
Eat Well
Hospital List
How to react
Reactions
Support Groups
Timelines
Treats
Wigs
A Message
Sections
Genetics
Secondaries
Younger Women
JaneRA's Blog
Register Here
Imaging
by an active member of our forums who has worked in nuclear medicine
in a large Canadian hospital for 14 years
This article was posted as a response to the question
:
Dear girls, MRI's, CT scans, PET scans, do these
particular procedures detect without a doubt any lurking cells, more so
than for example a bone scan would show. I was wondering, what arthritis
looks like, compared to cancer on a bone scan,how can they tell. The docs
must be 100% on their interpretations surely, any thoughts much appreciated,
just wondered,. never asked at the time after my bone scan, the doc never
mentioned hotspot, just that the bonescan showed up arthritis, but when
I read up on bone scans arthritis can show as a hotspot......
MRI's and CT's and bone scans are all useful tools in seeing if there
are any residual cancer cells remaining in your body. However, each imaging
modality shows different things and some are better at answering a particular
question.
Bone scans, show anything that can affect the bones. For example, arthritis,
an old injury or fractures and of course any cancer that has spread to
the bones. Your bones are constantly growing and remodeling all of the
time. When you have a bone scan, we inject you with a radioactive analog
of phosphate and your bones are unable to tell the difference between
this radioactive phosphate and the normal dietary phosphate. Your bones
need phosphate to grow and repair themselves.
You have osteoblasts which are cells that build up and repair the bones
and osteoclasts which break down the bones. In a normal healthy individual,
the osteoclasts and osteoblasts are in sync so bone is repaired and rebuilt
as it needs to be. In a patient with cancer that has spread to the bone,
the osteoclasts and osteoblasts are not in sync and the bone is destroyed
faster than it can be rebuilt. Having said this, not all bone secondaries
appear as hot spots on a scan. A lot of them do, however some secondaries
appear as cold spots. The difference being if the cancer cells are attacking
the osteoclastic or osteoblastic cells.
Radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians are highly trained and you
can tell the difference between arthritis and secondaries in the bone.
Arthritis will appear in the hips, knees, feet and spine and areas of
the bone where there is increased wear and tear. The appearance of a bone
secondary is very different than that of an arthritis. Bone secondaries
appear in the axial skeleton. Meaning they appear in most commonly in
the long bones, the ribs, spine, hips, legs, skull, and arms. They have
a very different appearance than that of arthritis or a fracture.
So, bottom line is if your bone scan has been reported as arthritis, you can rest assured that it really is probably just arthritis. As I am one of the biggest worriers, I totally understand how you are feeling and hope I was able to alleviate your fears. As I am in the bone scan biz, the one thing, I can stress is, if you are ever told that there is an area of concern on your bone scan and it is followed up by xrays and the xrays come back normal INSIST that you are followed very closely. Have them repeat the bone scan in 2 months. Any secondary in the bone will appear much earlier on a bone scan than it will on an xray. I have seen it many times where a person will present with a single spot on a bone scan and they will then have an xray. The xray will come back normal and the patient will be reassured that all is well........and then whammo, they start having pain in other spots and a further bone scan shows that there is massive spread everywhere. It breaks my heart to see this but I have seen it and if I can prevent one person from having to go down that road, then I have to do it.
The difference between CT and nuclear medicine is that
CT shows anatomy and can give precise dimensions of lesions and tumours.
CT is better at showing tumours in liver and lungs and brain and gives
very clear pictures. CT's are excellent for looking at soft tissues. Nuclear
medicine looks at physiology meaning how the body is functioning. For
example with the bones, we see if the cancer has spread to the bones.
We also do many other scans in nuclear medicine. A lot of you willl be
familiar with the MUGA scans that we do to check the function of your
heart and we calculate the ejection fraction to make sure that the chemo
isn't having a nasty affect on your heart.
MRI's take pictures by aligning the hydrogen ions in your body with the
use of a big magnet. These pictures also take a close look at the anatomy
and can give measurements to tumours and can be used to look at soft tissues
as well as bones.