BCPals
Forums
BCPals Quiz
Photo Album
BCPals Chat
BCPals Links
Contacts
Medical Topics
Biopsies
Chemotherapy Depression Diagnosis
Herceptin
Hormone therapies
Imaging
Lymphoedema
PMPS
PN
Phyllodes
Ports
Radiotherapy
Reconstruction?
Reg. Recurrence
Scans Experience of
Scars
Surgery Diaries
Trials
Triple Negative
Special Topics
Benefits
Clothing
Eat Well
Hospital List
How to react
Reactions
Support Groups
Timelines
Treats
Wigs
A Message
Sections
Genetics
Secondaries
Younger Women
JaneRA's Blog
Register Here
Risk-reducing Oophorectomy
by c
A few months post bi-lateral risk-reducing mastectomy I returned to
see my genetics consultant for a review and was advised that to reduce
my risks of breast and ovarian cancer further I should consider removal
of the ovaries and fallopian tubes which is called bi-lateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
Like risk-reducing mastectomy this procedure does not take away the
risk completely as some ovarian tissue lines the peritoneum. I felt
I needed some time to consider and research this as it would be yet
more surgery; but after 3 months of consideration, talking to my psych-oncology
nurse again and reading up on the pros and cons of such a step at my
age (54 a year post-menopausal) I decided to ask for a referral to the
surgeon recommended by Genetics, a gynaecological oncologist. The procedure
should be done in such a way as to minimise the risk of any potential
cancer cells being lost in the pelvis which is also checked for abnormalities
at the same time. The surgeon confimed that because of my age and having
had a symptom-free menopause, it was very unlikely that I would suffer
significant post-op problems in terms of hot flushes etc and that my
increasing post-menopausal risk of ovarian cancer outweighed issues
around oophorectomy as I am fit and healthy with good bone and heart
health. It was agreed that we would go ahead with a timescale of about
a 12 week wait.
The operation is usually a straightforward one with an overnight stay
in hospital; several pelvic screening exams were carried out in a very
thorough pre-op session to try to preempt any problems while in Theatre.
It is usually done as a keyhole procedure (laparoscopically) which means
that a camera is put through the tummy button to see internally while
instruments are inserted at either side of the tummy to remove the ovaries
and tubes. In my case there was a fourth incision on the bikini line
to remove everything intact as the tissue was to be sent off to Pathology.
The incisions were 1cm long with 1 or 2 stitches through each which
were removed 1 week later by my surgery nurse. They were covered by
a dressing which I removed one day post-op in the shower prior to being
discharged; I had no real pain; after the usual morphine in Theatre
I then handled my own pain relief with paracetamol only which makes
going home quickly more of a certainty for me.
One side-effect of the abdomen being filled with gas to help the surgeon see what he is doing is possible nerve pain in the back and shoulders. I did not get this though I could feel bubbles of gas lodged under my diaphragm for several days...getting mobile is the key to this being absorbed quickly. Other complications can include bleeding, damage to other organs, infection.
I was discharged post-op to my GP who I then saw for a check one month
later; this operation is much easier than the mastectomy; however it
is abdominal surgery and the surgeon advised me not to drive for 4 weeks,
not to lift for 6 at least and to be generally cautious about doing
too much too soon.
The wounds have healed very well and I have started using the Mepiform
silicone gel sheets as suggested by the surgical nurse to ensure the
best outcome for the scars.
Scar management
Next :
Nipple Reconstruction
Areola Tattooing
From the beginning :
Risk Reducing Mastectomies in 2 OPs
Surgery Diaries
Surgery Diaries
WLE for DCIS
SNB
Guide Wire
Reconstructions
Diep
LD
Bilateral LD
Delayed LD
Revised LD
Silicone/exp
SGAP
IGAP
Expansion
Imp Ex & nipple
Nipple Tattoo
Risk-Reducing
Implants 2 ops
Oophorectomy